SOAR Consultancy: Advancing Inclusive Research for Policy Impact

 SOAR Partners recently collaborated with the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) on a critical project examining the impact of employment law changes on individuals with Intellectual Developmental Disabilities (IDD). This case study highlights SOAR's expertise in conducting inclusive research that informs policy decisions.

The Challenge:

The GAO sought to investigate the outcomes of eliminating 14(c) certificates, which previously allowed employers to pay subminimum wages to workers with disabilities. Recognizing the complexity and sensitivity of this issue, the GAO required a specialized contractor capable of effectively interviewing individuals with IDD. SOAR's proven track record in this area made them the ideal choice for this project.

SOAR's Methodology:

SOAR employed a human-centered design approach, utilizing best practices in inclusive research. Their methodology incorporated visual aids, picture cards, and assistive technologies to accommodate diverse communication needs. This thoughtful approach ensured that participants with varying abilities could effectively express their experiences and opinions.

Implementation:

The research team conducted in-person interviews across two states: Oregon and Colorado. SOAR engaged not only with individuals directly affected by the 14(c) certificate elimination but also with their family members and guardians. This comprehensive approach provided a well-rounded perspective on the impact of the policy change.

Significance and Impact:

SOAR's research is set to become a crucial component of a publicly available GAO report, scheduled for release in the summer of 2024. By capturing the lived experiences of former 14(c) workers and their support networks, SOAR has provided valuable insights that will inform future policy decisions. This work gives voice to a demographic often underrepresented in policy discussions.

Outcomes:

The intentional and compassionate interview process employed by SOAR yielded rich, qualitative data. Their approach not only gathered essential information but did so in a manner that respected the dignity and rights of participants. The resulting case studies are expected to provide Congress, executive agencies, and the public with a clear understanding of how policy changes affect individuals with IDD in the employment sector.

Conclusion:

SOAR's collaboration with the GAO demonstrates the power of inclusive research in shaping policy. By prioritizing accessibility and employing adaptive communication strategies, SOAR successfully bridged the gap between policymakers and those directly affected by legislation. This case study underscores SOAR's capability to handle complex, sensitive projects and produce results that can drive meaningful change.